Agile software development has proven to be more successful than traditional methods. However there are many Agile methodologies (Scrum, Kanban, Lean, XP). It is difficult to make a right choice.
Do you what to know the differences between Scrum and Lean? Perhaps you struggle with your existing Scrum implementation and looking for a better methodology. So did I. I spent many hours looking for continuous improvement beyond Retrospectives and Sprint Reviews. And I found my answer in applying Lean Principles.
This session will help you to increase your understanding of Lean and Scrum. It will also give you some practical examples of implementing Lean in Scrum teams.

 
1 favorite thumb_down thumb_up 5 comments visibility_off  Remove from Watchlist visibility  Add to Watchlist
 

Outline/structure of the Session

The materials will be delivered in a lecture format.
There are no exercises planned for this session, although I plan small interactions with the audience:
e.g.: The audience will use thumb voting as an example of feedback technique

Session has the following outline:

1. Introduction and check-in (2 minutes). It will include small check-in exercise to draw attention from attendees.

2. Introduction to Lean (10 minutes). This section will cover history of Lean, differences between Lean in Manufacturing and Software Development, 7 principles of Lean Thinking in Software with examples for each of these principles.

3. Principles of Lean within Scrum (5 minutes). During these 5 minutes I will identifying Lean Principles within Scrum roles, events, processes and artefacts.

4. Lean beyond Scrum (7 minutes). Examples of applying Lean thinking to Scrum team to eliminate waste, amplify learning, build integrity (i.e. product backlog iceberg, test driven development etc)

5. Lean Startup (13 minutes). This session will cover Innovation is Software Development and Learning Experiment as a tool to achieve Innovation. I will cover Lean Startup practices such as Minimum Viable Product, Lean Canvas, Deploy First Code Later, Vanity Metrics.

6. Wrap-up (5 minutes). In this section I will summarise the session and will reiterate main learning points.

7. Questions (3 minutes).

Learning Outcome

This session will clarify similarities and differences between Lean and Scrum.
It will show audience how to carry out continuous improvement techniques beyond Retrospectives and Sprint Reviews using Lean Thinking.
This knowledge will also help people to reboot struggling Scrum teams.

Target Audience

Scrum Masters, Agile Project Managers, Agile Coaches, Managers and Team Leaders

schedule Submitted 4 years ago

Comments Subscribe to Comments

comment Comment on this Proposal
  • Tathagat Varma
    By Tathagat Varma  ~  4 years ago
    reply Reply

    Hi Pavel - for the target audience proposed, we might already expect a fair bit of awareness on this topic (most of them being a combination of the flavors of the season including CSM, CSPO,ACP, Kanban practitioner, LSC practitioner, etc.). How do you propose to make it relevant and helpful for such mix of audience?

    -TV

    • Pavel Dabrytski
      By Pavel Dabrytski  ~  3 years ago
      reply Reply

      Hi Tathagat,

      Could you please help me to understand you question better :)

      What I get is that you are concerned that audience will have certain knowledge of Scrum, Kanban or any other framework. Perhaps they even have a certification in one of the fields. Great! Even more, I expect that for the season to be successful. People attending, tried and succeeded (or failed), and now they are coming to the confirence to learn more and go beyond stadard practices and common Agile knowledge.

      My session offers exactly that. It is looking into Scruming the Scrum. Comparing two ideas of Scrum and Lean and going beyond both of them.

      Based on my previous experice, and statics available, most people start with Scrum, and there is much less awareness of Lean principles, this way I plan to 'sell' my talk to the audience, because they would like to know more about Lean.

      And of course I can't make it relevant for absolutely everyone at the conference, but that is the reason we have multiple tracks at Agile India 2014.

      Hope I was able to answer your question :)

      Regards. Pavel.

      • Tathagat Varma
        By Tathagat Varma  ~  3 years ago
        reply Reply

        Hi Pavel - the review panel feels the proposal is not a strong fit within Beyond Agile. You might want to explore more tracks, or let us know if there is something we missed while looking at your proposal?

        -TV

    • Jerry Rajamoney
      By Jerry Rajamoney  ~  4 years ago
      reply Reply

      Hi Pavel,

      Thanks for the detail process that helps to visualize the content. I can see the flow from Agile to Scrum to Lean to Lean Startup.

      Since you have mentioned about "Conotinuous Improvement" I was thinking you will be mentioning about Kaizen. But I could not see that. Do you think it adds value by including Kaizen too? Do you want to look at Kaikaku also?

      Thanks for your time.

      Regards,

      Jerry

      • Pavel Dabrytski
        By Pavel Dabrytski  ~  3 years ago
        reply Reply

        Hi Jerry,

        good question.

        I would like to keep it simple and focused. As speakers we know a lot in our domain, and sometimes we fall into trap of trying to cover too many things. I've been there :)

        Perhaps I will metion Kaizen, as it is Lean terminology for Continuous Improvement (as what it means in Japanese anyway). But I think adding Kaizen (or Kaikaku) as extra focus points might do more harm than good. Both of them are worthy of a talk on its own.

        Hope I made sense. :)

        Regards. Pavel.

         


    • Liked Tarang Baxi
      keyboard_arrow_down

      Tarang Baxi - A Practical Guide to Setting up Distributed Agile Projects

      45 mins
      Talk
      Beginner

      A practical guide to setting up a new agile project team. Based on years of agile delivery and coaching experience for projects in a number of distributed and offshore models, for teams sized from 10 to 200 people, and spread across 4 continents, and 8+ locations. Some areas that will be touched on:

      • People - how to organize distributed teams, cultural factors to consider, ways to build trust, and how to avoid timezone burnout.
      • Process - how to communicate effectively, plan collaboratively, setup distributed practices (standups, retros, pairing, etc), effectively divide work on a common codebase, maintain visibility, and track progress.
      • Tools - (tips provided as a handout) which hardware and software tools should you absolutely invest in to help overcome communication,  visibility and collaboration challenges
    • Liked Dinesh Sharma
      keyboard_arrow_down

      Dinesh Sharma - Offshoring Agile Projects - Myth, lies and Facts

      45 mins
      Talk
      Advanced

      Offshoring in an agile environment (especially with Indian IT organisation) is always a hot topic within agile communities. You will often find people talk about challenges rather than opportunities with offshoring agile projects e.g.

      • communication challenge,
      • lack of focus on quality,
      • rigid offshore organisation environment,
      • lack of agile practice knowledge,
      • lack of trust etc.

      Although these constraint-cum-challenges often directly linked to offshoring but it can exists in a non-offshore environment as well. For example, to see how you can work effectively with distributed teams you don't need run a project in offshore environment, just split your teams and ask them to sit on a different floor without seeing each other face to face and all these so called offshore challenges will appear in an onsite environment as well.

      So lets understand various Myths, lies and facts about offshoring agile project and understand key ingredients to make it successful.