• Liked Madhavi Ledalla
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Deep dive into RETROSPECTIVES- how do we break the usual norms so that these reflections could be made thought-provoking ones!

    Madhavi Ledalla
    Madhavi Ledalla
    Jerry Rajamoney
    Jerry Rajamoney
    schedule 2 years ago
    Sold Out!
    60 mins
    Workshop
    Intermediate

             Retrospectives are the primary learning, reflection and readjustment techniques on agile projects. A good Agile team is always striving to become better than before. And an effective retrospective enables the team to sieze its opportunity to improve! 

    Retrospectives enable whole-team learning, act as catalysts for change, and generate action.

    R-> Realize where you are and where you want to be

    E-> Engage the teams in fruitful discussions

    T-> Team work to build “We over I” attitude

    R-> Relish the power of Inspect and Adapt cycles

    O->Openness and Transparency to make retrospectives efficient and effective

    In my view, this is not any new concept or a jargon the team needs to really master, but yes in reality sometimes it becomes challenging to keep the momentum lively all times! Over a period of time, we see these symptoms in a retrospective. 

    R-> Repeated issues pop-up

    E-> Engrossing & Engaging discussions are missing

    T-> Team present virtually, loses trust.

    R-> Routine stuff, nothing interests the teams.

    O->Observably gets boring over time.

    To catalyse conversations among team members, retrospectives need to be viewed from a different perspective. This presentaion talks about why the retrospectives efficacy fades off over a period of time and then talks about some very interesting techniques that I used with the teams to make these meetings lively!  Teams need to do out-of-box thinking and appreciate that these short gatherings need not  be done only by using the techniques or methods prescribed in the book but could be done by quoting some situational specific examples that would make the teams really think and speak!

     

  • Diana Larsen
    Diana Larsen
    schedule 2 years ago
    Sold Out!
    90 mins
    Workshop
    Beginner

    Over the past ten years, software development teams using Agile approaches to work have adopted retrospective meetings as a critical practice for learning and continuous improvement. To the extent that practitioners say, “If you’re not holding iteration retrospectives, you’re not doing Agile.”

     Agile retrospectives at the end of each iteration or work increment set aside time for the team to examine feedback from current conditions and develop targeted tactics to keep the project on track. Many practitioners experience retrospectives as great means for detecting good, poor, and missing practices; as a handle to make tacit knowledge about effective practices explicit; and to define improvement actions in order to deal with ineffective or inefficient technical, process, and teamwork practices.

    However, too many teams and practitioners don’t reap the benefits that effective retrospective meetings can provide. Too many retrospective meetings receive cursory or inadequate facilitation. Too many retrospective meetings are held to  “check the box” on the project management template, rather than to focus on real improvements. For too many teams, the action plans coming out of retrospectives are never implemented or revisited. Too many teams seek to shift blame and responsibility for action through the retrospective.

    In too many organizations, retrospective meetings don’t deliver the promised return on time invested (ROTI).

    In this session, you’ll learn how to get the most from your retrospective practices. Diana Larsen, co-author of Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Teams Great, will introduce you to a simple framework for getting better outcomes from retrospective meetings, suggest ways to maintain the relevance of improvement to the work of your team, and provide tips and pointers to get great returns from the time your teams devote to every meeting. 

Sorry, no proposals found under this section.