Maturing the Agile Way contains 2 Agile maturity models, Qualitative and Quantitative model, deals with the concept of Organizational comparative Agile maturity index,  which quickly and reliably determine how agile an organization is compared to other organizations.

This company Which had been adopting Agile over several months, wanted to understand realized business benefits in terms of more reliable, shorter, milestone releases and improved quality (as measured by defect introduction rate). However, most often those with visibility across the full adoption effort many times noted that the adoption of Agile had been "uneven," and wanted to take the adoption effort "to the next level."  This in turn may give room for improved agility with many more areas in which additional business value could be added.

The goal of taking the agile maturity assessment was to better understand the areas on which the company should focus next. Based on the results of their assessment, the company may decide the need to emphasize improvements on few focus areas during particular time period.

This presentation also contains Scrum Master Maturity index, to create a learning plan for Scrum Master towards continuous improvement.

 
1 favorite thumb_down thumb_up 9 comments visibility_off  Remove from Watchlist visibility  Add to Watchlist
 

Outline/structure of the Session

Outline of Sequence of Events

1. Presentation

2. Video lesson

3. Hands on

4. Report demo

5. Retrospective

 

 

Learning Outcome

The experience report helps organizations to focus on the teams that are lagging behind in terms of Agility and also compare and reflect the agility metrics on the enterprise dashboards.

 

Target Audience

Agile Coaches, Scrum Master, Project Manager, Vice President, Director

schedule Submitted 2 years ago

Comments Subscribe to Comments

comment Comment on this Proposal
  • Joel Tosi
    By Joel Tosi  ~  2 years ago
    reply Reply

    Hi Sekhar,

       Interesting submission.  Does this assessment take into account the situation where a 'lagging team' is lagging because of environmental constraints?

     

    Best,

    Joel

    • Sekhar Burra
      By Sekhar Burra  ~  2 years ago
      reply Reply

      Hi Joel,

      Yes, it reflects the lagging team situation due to several factors like organization impediments, Organization culture, Existing processes and Team work.

       

      Thanks

      Sekhar

      • Tathagat Varma
        By Tathagat Varma  ~  2 years ago
        reply Reply

        Sekhar - we find the maturiy map (slide #19 in your deck) interesting idea for the conference attendees. Could you talk about maturity mpa and how it relates to agile maturity and what challenges did you face, etc. in a 20minute session?

        thanks

        TV

        • Sekhar Burra
          By Sekhar Burra  ~  2 years ago
          reply Reply

          Hi Tathagat,

           

          My session would need atleast 45 min, however, if you want me to cut down to 20 min, the participants may not get any value out of this talk.

          However, if you want me to cut down to 20 min, I can do that. 

          Can this model be included in the Scaling track, since it largely deals with Enterprise Agility ?

          Thanks

          Sekhar

          • Naresh Jain
            By Naresh Jain  ~  2 years ago
            reply Reply

            Hi Sekhar,

            I'm surprised that you feel a 20 mins sessions won't add any value to the participants. Then on what basis do we select this talk?

            P.S: All TED Talks are 20 mins and those are some of the best presentations I've ever seen.

            • Sekhar Burra
              By Sekhar Burra  ~  2 years ago
              reply Reply

              Hi Naresh,

              I have presented this talk several times before, unless I fully complete the presentation and show the data how I applied this in real time, it may be difficult for particiapnts to understand.

              That is why I'm asking for more time, if possible.

              Thanks

              Sekhar

              • Naresh Jain
                By Naresh Jain  ~  2 years ago
                reply Reply

                Hi Sekhar,

                As TV pointed out, the committee finds Slide 19 from your deck most useful to the participants. We are mostly interested in the lessons learned applying the model described on Slide 19. Can you descope your presentation to focus on just those elements in 20 mins? If yes, please update your prosoal (timing and structure) accordingly. Else we'll have to skip this talk.

                Thank you for your understanding.

                • Sekhar Burra
                  By Sekhar Burra  ~  2 years ago
                  reply Reply

                  Thanks Naresh and TV,

                  I prefer to withdraw my submission.

          • Tathagat Varma
            By Tathagat Varma  ~  2 years ago
            reply Reply

            Sekhar - can you pl respond back on Naresh's last question so that we could close it ASAP.

             

            thanks,

            TV