A Social Psychology Toolkit for a Blame-Free Workplace
- Do 'Blame Game Politics' rule your workplace?
- Are you frustrated of retrospective meetings that result in zero outcomes due to endless debates on who is to take the blame?
- Does the "Blame" monster haunt you every time you try to do something new?
- Are you afraid of taking risks for the fear of being labelled the 'wrong' one?
- And, above all, do you wish to tackle the blame game monster?
If yes, then this session is for you. This session introduces a toolkit to free oneself and others from the biases, based on research studies in the field of Social Psychology. The toolkit provides one an 'objective' view of the situation at hand to decide on further actions rather than debating on who is wrong.
This session introduces common biases like 'Confirmation Bias' and the 'Fundamental Attribution Error', which every human being falls prey to. The attendees will also be performing a guided team activity that helps them practice the Covariation Model to zero-in to the real root cause of any problem.
Outline/structure of the Session
- Introduction - 3 min
- What is Blame Game? - 3 min
- Effect of Blame on Happiness - 5 min
- The Blamer's Perspective - 5 min
- Activity - Confirmation Bias - 5 min
- Illustration - Fundamental Attribution Error - 4 min
- If everyone is biased, are we all doomed? - 1 min
- Covariation Model - The Objectivity Tool - 2 min
- Covariation Model - A Group Activity - 10 min
- How to influence coworkers? - 2 min
- Summary + Q & A - 5 min
The participants will leave the session with
- An understanding of how blame affects workplace happiness
- A realization that everyone has inbuilt biases, including themselves
- A hands-on practical experience of applying covariation model to find root cause of a problem, without taking blame
- How to influence co-workers to avoid blame resulting in happy working patterns
schedule Submitted 1 year ago
People who liked this proposal, also liked:
Vivek Ganesan - Blameless CI - Bashing Cultural Monsters in Continuous IntegrationVivek GanesanAgile/DevOps Change AgentAccenture-SolutionsIQ
schedule 1 year agoSold Out!
Does your organization frown upon “Build Breakers”? Does your team spend a lot of time fixing integration issues in CI? Do you see a lot of “Who broke the build now?” emails? Do your team members hesitate to commit their code for the fear of causing a build failure?
If you wish to know what you can do to make the situation better, this session is for you.
Continuous Integration is a powerful way to identify and eliminate certain risks, particularly when multiple teams are rallying towards a planned release. Even if you are not working on a planned release, Continuous Integration will help you to cut-out a release sooner than you would if you did not have CI.
When organizations or teams start adopting Continuous Integration for the first time, they develop an untold habit to chastise the build breaker, whenever a build breaks. Most of the time, the reprimanded build breaker is a person and not a thing, a machine or a process
Vivek Ganesan - Workplace Happiness - Does Agility Keep us Happy?Vivek GanesanAgile/DevOps Change AgentAccenture-SolutionsIQ
schedule 1 year agoSold Out!
With the increase in population that separates ‘work’ from ‘life’, as if work is absence of life, it becomes increasingly important to study about what happiness means to people at work, so that they can be made to feel alive in their offices too. This session is aimed at introducing two interesting research studies that aimed to do just that. Also, this session helps people understand if agility keeps us happy in the true sense.
The two studies that this session will discuss about are as follows:
- Richard M. Ryan et al’s Self Determination Theory – led to a book Drive by Dan Pink
- Mihaly’s Measurement of Flow in Everyday’s life – led to book Flow by Mihaly himself
This session does not just explain these two research works but also will find the commonalities between these and will engage the audience with discussions using leading questions, thereby bringing out personal examples that they can relate to.