Putting the 'Lean' into Lean portfolio management -Transforming the way we think and manage work at scale

Creating an allocation approach is difficult in environments of increasing uncertainty and growing scale. In an organisational context, there's a tendency to default to SAFE's Lean Portfolio Management as a 'lean' response. Having managed Investment Planning in a corporate context for several years, there's an opportunity to integrate lighter, less formalised methods to categorise, prioritise & manage portfolio worktypes. Outputs versus desired outcomes should guide decision-making around planning approach.

The desired outcomes are the place to start - the basis of decision-making is a bias to value.

Components of Lean Portfolio Management such as value streams, Quarterly Investment Review (QIR) & Quarterly Business Review (QBR) can be used with more standardised portfolio planning processes.

This talk will discuss experiences in continuously reviewing progress in transforming portfolios of work to enable Organisational Agility via continuous planning.

 
2 favorite thumb_down thumb_up 2 comments visibility_off  Remove from Watchlist visibility  Add to Watchlist
 

Outline/Structure of the Case Study

5 min: Introducing my definition of the 'Lean' of Lean portfolio management

10 min: Lean prioritisation models

10 min: Planning & Prioritisation funnel - prioritisation of work to deliver prioritised value

10 min: Doing lean portfolio management by starting with desired outcomes

5 min: Measuring and costing portfolio management

5 min: Summary & Suggestions for trying in your own organisations

Learning Outcome

Participants will walk away with insights on the challenges and opportunities in transforming how you manage portfolios at scale; & options for doing so

Practical examples of lean portfolio management that could be applied in your own organisations

Target Audience

Anyone who works at the enterprise level

Prerequisites for Attendees

Enterprise level transformation experience

Stories (and scars) working across portfolios; with PMOs;

Interest in the challenges of managing dependencies & managing agile at scale

schedule Submitted 4 months ago

Public Feedback

comment Suggest improvements to the Speaker
  • Joel Tosi
    By Joel Tosi  ~  4 months ago
    reply Reply

    Hi Penelope, thanks for the submission.  I appreciate the content and context, but am curious as to how this fits into the continuous delivery track?  My assumption is the continuous planning aspect of it which you mention, but I want to make sure I am not off.

     

    Best,

    Joel

    • Penelope Barr
      By Penelope Barr  ~  4 months ago
      reply Reply

      Hi - yes you're correct. My contention is that continuous planning is a viable option to all of the models of 'big room planning' and their big $, big time investments, big expectations.  I'm advocating the lean, more pragmatic, more outcome-driven aspects of planning.  This topic generates a LOT of interest & divides opinion!!


  • Liked Penelope Barr
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Penelope Barr - From Dogma to Pragma - helping 500 squads on the road to agile maturity

    45 Mins
    Talk
    Intermediate

    What a joy to be in a key leadership position in one of the largest-ever corporate experiments - the transition to new ways of working. I'm accountable for establishing and operating the Centre of Expertise, New Ways of Delivering - how we uplift culture, delivery & technical capability. We're doing this through consulting, coaching, educating, facilitating & mentoring.

    The scope - 5000 people, 500 squads, 6 regions.

    The process - Think systemically, optimise locally.

    The result - it's a process...

  • Liked Penelope Barr
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Penelope Barr - Getting to MV(r)P - Getting to the Minimum Validated RIGHT Problem (or making sure you're solving the right thing)

    90 Mins
    Workshop
    Intermediate
    Many people have embraced the concept of MVP (minimum valuable product or minimum viable product) ie delivering the smallest increment of customer value. However, once developed, these MVPs are also criticised for not being viable, for a range of reasons.
    I prefer to focus on delivering the 'right' MVrP – Minimum Validated (right) Problem ie a tested solution or experiment outcome aligned to a customer problem.
    In this session, we’ll explore the power of using an end-to-end model of:
    - design-thinking to understand customer problems
    - lean experimentation to validate these problems to arrive at the right MVP
    - that's delivered using agile techniques as an MVP
    - and embedded via lean change methodologies
    Together we'll explore a range of tools and techniques to achieve this practice:
    - Outcomes Overview of an end-to-end model for managing problem:solution:delivery:change
    - The Lean sprint
    - How to design an experiment
    - Creating the Validation plan
    - An experiments wall
    - Developing a one-page experiment report