Applying Gamification Techniques in Agile
- One of the world’s largest legal product & services provider.
- Development and global rollout of online legal research product for law firms to efficiently provide online research and analytical capabilities.
- Several hundred million dollar product revenue
- 400 Team size.
- Product Development and subsequent enhancement and support.
- Stringent Timelines
- Most of the team new to agile
- 4 Timezones
Key Challenges on "people" front:
- Scale up the team to use agile in short time frame
- Engage and motivate the team
- Be a true vendor partner with the customer
Industry analysts predict rapid adoption of gamification. By 2014, more than 70% of Global 2000 organizations will have at least one gamified application, according to Gartner, Inc. In this presentation, we would be focusing on how gamification helped us adddress the above challenges. Concept of “gamification” was used to drive the team to embrace agile and improve employee engagement and motivation. This helped further boost the quality and increase the overall customer satisfaction across sprints and releases.
Outline/structure of the Session
5 min - What is Gamification
15 min - People Challenges seen in the engagement while adopting agile
15 min - How Gamification addressed these challenges
10 min - Q & A
An already published paper on this concept is provided in the link below. Do let us know in addition to this if a slide deck is also required.
1. Using non-monetary techniques to motivate and engage teams
2. How to apply gamification in client - vendor scenario
Scrum Masters, Agile Coaches
Participants need to be familiar with agile techniques
schedule Submitted 2 years ago
People who liked this proposal, also liked:
The Art of SQL Database Refactoring
"We've tested this feature thoroughly and it worked really well. But for some weird reason, it's really slow in production today...must be a network issue...or may be the server is having a bad day..."
Do you often hear these kinds of comments in your development team? Let us guess, your application is very data-centric and churns big blocks of data on every user request. And under the hood, your application is most probably heavily dependent on long/complex queries with joins, temp-tables, case-statements, nested queries, etc.
These SQL queries probably started-out very simple. But as your requirements evolved, iteration after iterations, the queries also grew in complexity. And most often, even if you test-drove your newer stories, the performance of these complex queries is not evident until you run them in production.
Given that our requirements will evolve and so will our database, how do you deal with the above problems?
There are TWO essential parts to evolutionary database design:
- The art of refactoring your SQL queries.
- Figuring out the right balance of what processing is done in SQL on the DB sides and what is done on your service side in your App/Web Server.
Join us as we take a tour of how we refactored our complex, non-performant queries and overall DB without hurting our time-to-market.
Inverting Test Pyramid - A First Hand Experience Report
Test automation is extremely crucial in adoption of an agile delivery. However, it can take one for a ride, if the approach is not correct. In this sensational, heart throbbing, experience report, we'll share our story of how we turned around an inefficient, expensive automation style to lean, efficient style. In addition to sharing a real-world example, we'll also share some of the key challenges we faced and how we solved them. If you are convinced about the Testing Pyramid, but are struggling to invert it, then this session is for you.
Earlier Defect Detection - Higher test coverage at Unit/Intermediate layers lead to earlier defect detection. Reduced number of issues found on higher test environments/Production. Reduced cost of defect fixing.
Reduced maintenance cost - UI tests are fragile and costlier to maintain Vs backend tests. No of changes in services layer are comparatively less.
Reduced test execution time - Backend tests are much faster. Almost 7-10 times faster than UI Tests - improved build certification time.
Test feedbacks are naturally distributed across layers of application. Test feedbacks are more pin pointed/ granular.
Spotless Clean Frontend Development with BDD, DSL and StoryboardsFrans Overbeek
schedule 2 years agoSold Out!
After 3 years of improving our frontend development process we ended up with mixing BDD, DSL and Storyboards for developing spotless clean frontend code. Each approach is already powerful on his own but combining these will make them unbeatable. The characteristics are collaborate, communicate and visualize, BDD is the collaborating process between disciplines, DSL for enabling the communication and Storyboards for visualization.
Techniques to Speed Up your Build Pipeline for Faster Feedback.
I would like to share my experience and journey on how we brought down our Jenkins build pipeline time down from over 90 minutes to under 12 minutes. In the process, I would share specific techniques which helped and also some, which logically made sense, but actually did not help. If your team is trying to optimize their build times, then this session might give you some ideas on how to approach the problem.
Development Impact - For one of our build job, below graph shows how the number of builds in a day have increased over a period of time as the build time has reduced. Frequency of code check-in has increased; Wait time has reduced; failed test case faster to isolate and fix.
Business Impact - More builds leading to quicker feedback and faster story acceptance and less story spill over.