While Agile adoption and practice is a complex model for mid/large sized Product companies to implement, we see a need for some sort of framework that can help drive it.

Why do you need to be Agile? Where do you start, when do you start, and also how do you start? These are questions that reside in most of us during early stages of adoption. Here is a 9-Step breakdown that will help companies and teams adopt multiple Agile methodologies in different situations and scenarios. Maturing it from a ‘Persona Perspective’ framework helps the ‘decision-maker’ have a case for investment, further evaluate if it works, and improve it all through!!

The discussion and idea is just my proposal that should help a team or an organization and is need not be the only way to implement Agile in an organization. Further detailing into these phases can form an overall Mindmap structure that is open to adopting from an organization and people standpoint.

 
16 favorite thumb_down thumb_up 2 comments visibility_off  Remove from Watchlist visibility  Add to Watchlist
 

Outline/structure of the Session

1. Introduction to problem statement - 5 min

2. Where do you begin at an org level and where did we fail? - 10 min

3. What was done better elsewhere and how did we learn? - 10 min

4. Step by step adoption and transition to Agile from any other mehodology you may have. - 10 min

5. Q & A

Learning Outcome

Fail safe method of Agile adoption at an organization, presented in about 35 mins. These include experiments and learnings collected across various teams and companies that lead to organized method of adoption. it is definitely worth spending 45 mins of your time to take away 2 years of learning.

Target Audience

Anyone adoptiing Agile at organization level and want to take advantage of fail-safe learnings

schedule Submitted 3 years ago

Comments Subscribe to Comments

comment Comment on this Proposal
  • Naresh Jain
    By Naresh Jain  ~  3 years ago
    reply Reply

    Thanks for the proposal Naveen. Can you please share where this approach was used, what challenges were faced, how did your team over come them and finally what was the outcome?

    • Naveen Indusekhar
      By Naveen Indusekhar  ~  3 years ago
      reply Reply

      Thanks Naresh. Below inline are the answers:

       

      1. Where was this approach used?

      A: Most of the 9 steps were independantly applied at various stages in random mode within different organizational groups within the company that I worked. Couple of them have been misses and learnings from other Agile experts and organizations. What I have done is consolidated the practical implementations that have worked (and retrospection) combined with areas where we could have done better. Most organizations like ours struggle to decide between 2 approaches: 1. implement locally and scale across organization and 2. One shot implementation across organization. The proposal I'm making is a combination and with good set of realtime learnings.

      2. What challenges were faced?

      A: The challenges have been of 2 kinds based on 2 models of implementation:

      (i) Teams which went ahead with Agile for a single team struggled to coordinate and deliver products which had dependency with teams that weren't agile. The small set of team decided the future of Agile implementation of that BU. Luckliy for us, we succeeded with that team to some extent to impress the org to move that direction. This could have easily gone the other way without management support.

      (ii) Teams that went SAFe (another Business unit) and implemented it across 40-50 member sized teams had challenge in getting all of them to move towards Agility. In most cases one team pulled down the other team because they were still catching up. Implementing SI, Devops, release teams across this common set was a challenge as they were located in different countries and time zones. It took teams 6-12 months to get some sort of predictable delivery in place. We could have done better with initial assesment and proposal that was missing in this case.

      3. How did you overcome the challenges?

      A. Going top down and bottom up at the same time helped us a great deal in Business Units where we succeeded. We worked closely with management to get their buy in, invested time and efforts to train product management in aliging to Agile, worked with external facing business units like Sales, Marketing, etc to show them the flexibility they had in changing requirements. Most importantly teams go passionate once they understood their responsibility and empowerement that came along. Coach connect with teams was the game changer. One more aspect that I'm covering in other paper is transformation of Engineering Manager role in Agile workd. this was handled sensitevely and they backed the transformation all the way. In some teams we changed the employee success evaluation method to team success (working with HR) and this helped in resolving Dev-QA split issues and more importantly the Bell curve measurement. Agile PLF helped a great deal as well, which had a high level organizational direction, at the same time open for customization within teams. And of course the technical track of XP practices, strict Definition of Done tracking, Acceptance Criteria, and other practices helped.

      4. What was the final outcome?

      A. In the last 2-3 years organization as a whole has 90% migrated to Agile methodologies. For a large organization this is a significant number. While there are still gaps in the way it is implemented (just by the shear numbers), it has been an effective transformation. The journey is still on. Some of the success stories are knit around world class quality metrics, predictability, teams that can run with no management overhead, individuals engineers thinking 'What' instead of just 'How', gap between dev-QA diminshed (some teams have no black box testers), cross functional skills gained, happy PMs for their freedom of changing/planning during the execution, evolving design, reaction to market (especially Consumer), and great work-life balance.


  • Liked Sachin Natu
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Sachin Natu / Naresh Jain - Inverting Test Pyramid - A First Hand Experience Report

    45 Mins
    Experience Report
    Intermediate

    Test automation is extremely crucial in adoption of an agile delivery. However, it can take one for a ride, if the approach is not correct. In this sensational, heart throbbing, experience report, we'll share our story of how we turned around an inefficient, expensive automation style to lean, efficient style. In addition to sharing a real-world example, we'll also share some of the key challenges we faced and how we solved them. If you are convinced about the Testing Pyramid, but are struggling to invert it, then this session is for you.

    Business Impact:

      Earlier Defect Detection - Higher test coverage at Unit/Intermediate layers lead to earlier defect detection. Reduced number of issues found on higher test environments/Production. Reduced cost of defect fixing.

      Reduced maintenance cost - UI tests are fragile and costlier to maintain Vs backend tests. No of changes in services layer are comparatively less.

      Reduced test execution time - Backend tests are much faster. Almost 7-10  times faster than UI Tests - improved build certification time.

      Test feedbacks are naturally distributed across layers of application. Test feedbacks are more pin pointed/ granular.

  • Liked Naveen Indusekhar
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Naveen Indusekhar - Research paper on 'What happens to Engineering Manager in Agile world'

    20 Mins
    Case Study
    Intermediate

    This is an extremly simple topic with a very complex answer. I have spent last 3 years experimenting and working with lot of people to understand what happens to the so called Manager role in Agile world. With a self organizing, empowered team, does Manager still have a role? Do you shelve these senior people who drove all your deliverables in the past for your company? Do you just let go the technical expertize these people bring along?

    The research information around the experiment and results will be shared and am very positive that this will help lot of organizations move forward with great benefits. We will see how certain gaps that are created with introduction of Agile can be solved through these senior professionals. At the same time teams don't need to compromize or business doesn't need to compromize on new found agility by adopting any of the Agile practices.

    The very next discussion that I will touch base as part of this presentation is the role of Project Leads. Many Leads resist movement to Agile because they feel their growth will now be stagnated. Is this true? It is again an interesting data set captured by talking to Leads in waterfall world and understanding what they really aspire for.

    Looking forward to sharing my insights with real implementation and resulting data that I'm sure each of you will benefit from.

  • Liked Pooja Wandile
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Pooja Wandile - Scaling Scrum To Large Distributed Teams and its Challenges

    60 Mins
    Experience Report
    Intermediate

    As designed for use, Scrum works well for small co-located teams, cross functional teams. As the popularity of Scrum starting growing, more and more companies started adopting Scrum with mixed results. But overall, the trend has been increasing. Off late, big enterprises have also started adopting agile for their business needs and building complex products. In a recent study, the number of enterprise customers adopting scrum has doubled in last 2 years and they have used distributed scrum on large programs. So, the question is, can agile scale beyond small and co-located teams and what challenges could be there?

    This presentation talks about our experience of implementing scrum on a large program, the challenges of scaling scrum and how to overcome these challenges.