Fish Bowl Session - Do you need a scaled agile framework to scale agile
An agile way of working has more than proven its worth in businesses across the world. Now with the proof being seen in the pudding lots of big organisations are looking to apply agile at scale. As a consequence, new frameworks and methodologies have more recently been launched into the industry marketed at helping businesses to scale their agile delivery. The agile manifesto talks about the need for individuals and interactions over process and tools. This Fishbowl discussion will discuss if the frameworks themselves are taking over being able to allow a business to become agile iteratively.
The Fishbowl session is designed to have a wide conversation around the scaling of agile. It will allow the conference members to participate in the discussion. We want to be able to drive out the conversation around scaled agile frameworks. Is it a marketing ploy or is it of real use to a business? Shouldn't we encourage businesses to start small (MVP) and build up to a scaled agile business.
Outline/structure of the Session
The Structure of the session will be as follows
Slide presentation for 10 mins
- Introduction to the facilitator of the session, including experince of the speaker in scaled agile delivery
- Explanation into scaled agile
- Examples of scaled agile frameworks and how they differ
- Introduction to how a Fishbowl session works and how members participate
Fishbowl Discussion 30 mins
- Hold and facilitate the fishbowl discussion
- If the topic starts to move off subject bring the group back, if the group gets a bit stuck with how to progress the conversation feed in options to help keep the conversation flowing
- Cover over the main topics discussed by the group
- Summarise some of the experience talked about
I expect that there will be for and against for this topic across the industry and it would be good to share those experiences and thoughts with everyone considering the Buzz word around some of these frameworks.
We want the people in the discussion to take away a few things
1) what are some of these scaled agile frameworks
2) where have they worked successful and where haven't they
3) what have others done in scaling agile without having a scaled agile framework.
This session is open to all roles working within agile delivery
schedule Submitted 1 year ago
People who liked this proposal, also liked:
Ralf Jeffery - Putting the 'V' back in MVPRalf JefferySenior Business AnalystEqual Experts
schedule 1 year agoSold Out!
The goal of an MVP is to build just enough of something to quantifiably test a business assumption or hypothesis. Traditionally, businesses approach new product development by spending substantial time and money researching, developing and building the final product. Even more time and effort is then spent marketing it to their target market. It’s go big or go home!
Lean Startup principles advocate a different approach; build the simplest version of the product or service that you can and get in front of your target market group as fast as possible. Watch them use it. Listen to their feedback. Then improve or change.
Most organisations when confronted with this approach understand the logic and benefits of an MVP. Why then, do so many struggle to execute successfully?
This talk discusses the principles of MVPs and the diverse ways in which they can be executed, illustrating with success stories. It discusses the common barriers encountered within organisations when creating an MVP, and highlights how they can be overcome from the perspective of each key stakeholder group.
Finally, drawing upon personal experience of working on agile projects within financial services, ecommerce and telecoms organisations, both large and small, discussion is made as to what factors are necessary for excellent MVP design.