In the federal public service there is an almost-complete disconnection between the performance evaluation criteria applied to business leaders and the criteria applied to service providers.

As a consequence, even in situations where both the business and the service provider enjoy optimal relationships, the goals are not the same and may even be entirely contradictory.

In a climate centered on Results and Delivery, leaders cannot expect results if they do not mitigate this conflict.

The approaches proposed in this discussion align the service organization to the business. They promote mutual accountability by insisting on mutual performance alignment between the business and its services provider.

 
2 favorite thumb_down thumb_up 0 comments visibility_off  Remove from Watchlist visibility  Add to Watchlist
 

Outline/structure of the Session

  • Compare business/service provider models in the private and public sectors
  • Define the metrics used to define accountability for service deployment
  • Assess the metrics' relative applicability to the public service model
  • Explore performance measurement methodologies:
    • Key Performance Indicators
    • National Project Management System
    • Error rates
    • Velocity
    • Backlog
  • Explore the mechanisms which reward performance:
    • Executive performance pay
    • Employee performance pay
    • Employee rewards and recognition
    • Innovative models for team recognition
  • Propose a probabilistic model which leverages agile methodologies to determine the likeliest success path to obtaining better services which align to the individual business and suit the whole of the organization

Learning Outcome

  • Lines of business will possess a framework to hold service providers accountable
  • Service providers will possess a framework to hold business lines accountable

Target Audience

Interested in learning how to get services to map directly to business priorities?

Prerequisite

  • Understand the public service context for mandated service delivery.
  • Understand that, in the public service, the pendulum swings back and forth over time between centralizing service provision and allowing business lines more freedom to choose their paths.
schedule Submitted 2 weeks ago

Comments Subscribe to Comments

comment Comment on this Proposal

  • Liked Lisa Fast
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Lisa Fast - Not too minimal: UX research in a Government MVP

    Lisa Fast
    Lisa Fast
    UX Unicorn
    Vation Inc.
    schedule 2 days ago
    Sold Out!
    30 mins
    Talk
    Beginner

    Lean UX research is essential to guide and validate what exactly is the 'Minimum Viable' to launch a Minimum Viable Product, especially in government.

    In this talk, I'll describe how user research insights helped us understand, design and launch Canada's first online open-source regulatory consultation. The first research participant identified a significant hole in our assumptions - and predicted that we could miss the minimum viable mark. It helped us course-correct, and plan ahead for the next development iteration.

    The other customer group was the government. We applied lean UX research techniques to understand the government analyst team's journey and needs, and then to co-design with them as the analysis site MVP was developed, and as the commenter data flowed in.

    I'll describe how the insights from the research helped us meet the Minimum Viable mark for the government customers, understand how and why we missed the mark with the specialist customers and how you can apply lean UX research techniques to ensure you don't iterate your way to a useless product.

  • Liked Ron Ijack
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Ron Ijack - Why we got rid of SCRUM to become agile again

    Ron Ijack
    Ron Ijack
    VP Technology
    Upstream Works Software
    schedule 2 weeks ago
    Sold Out!
    30 mins
    Talk
    Advanced

    Agile is not about doing scrum, kanban, lean or any other flavour of the process. An organization cannot be “doing” agile, they must “be” agile. They must believe in and understand the agile principles. After going through a successful agile transformation and running scrum for 3 years we realized that it’s just not working for us anymore. The team was suffering from scrum fatigue. It felt like there was a sprint planning, stand up or retrospective meeting happening all the time. We decided to take a hard look at how we were working and turn it on its head. We looked at all the different agile options such as scrum, kanban, lean, xp, etc and decided to take the best part from all of these instead of sticking with one approach. This session will take you through our journey and share what worked for us that could also work in your organization

  • Liked Steve Lavigne
    keyboard_arrow_down

    Steve Lavigne - Going Vertical; A Value Driven Approach to Web Development

    Steve Lavigne
    Steve Lavigne
    Product Owner
    OPIN Software Inc.
    schedule 1 month ago
    Sold Out!
    45 mins
    Talk
    Intermediate

    One of the biggest development hurdles we face when new to any agile framework is switching from a ‘phased’ approach to a ‘vertical slice’ approach.  Individuals and teams often aren’t used to deconstructing projects and problems in this way and we often hear “what about the dependancies” or “the system is too complex”.

    In order to speed up feedback loops and provide instant value to clients, we can take a large feature and break it up into several small pieces that slice through each of the systems architectural layers. We can break down almost any of the features we do within projects into slices that take a couple of days, at most, to get out the door. Each slice is comprised of any work needed to be done in a system architectural layer, as well as, any testing that may need to be done to make it ready for deployment.